DESIGN INTELLIGENCEJuly 24, 2026·Mary · DEPIX Design Intelligence

Your Brand Now Has a Sound

For a hundred years, a car brand was something you could see: a shape, a stance, a badge, a grille. Identity lived in sheet metal. Two quiet revolutions have broken that monopoly. The engine went silent, and the dashboard became a screen. And the moment those two things happened, a brand's identity stopped being purely visual - it became something you also hear, and something you watch move.

Start with sound, because the electric car created a problem nobody had before: a blank sonic canvas. Strip out the combustion engine and you remove the single richest identity signal a car ever had - the note a V8 makes, the way a flat-six settles at idle. What replaces it is not silence by default; it is a composition decision. BMW understood this early and hired Hans Zimmer to design the sound of its electric future. The result, IconicSounds Electric, is not a novelty chime - it is a full, mode-dependent sound world, using tricks like the endlessly-rising Shepard tone to make acceleration feel like it never tops out. Zimmer's own framing is telling: he wants future cars to have their own unique voice, as recognisable as a face. The engine note was never just feedback. It was branding, and now it has to be deliberately authored instead of inherited from physics.

This is not a car-only story. Across every category, brands have realised that in a world of smart speakers, podcasts and screens you glance at, audio identity is now core, not decoration. Mastercard removed its own name from its logo and leaned on a sonic brand identity - a short melodic signature built as a ten-layer system that plays at the moment a payment completes, engineered as carefully as any wordmark. When they launched the sonic logo, it was treated as a flagship identity asset, not an ad jingle. The case for doing this is now measurable: brands whose sound is properly aligned to their identity are far more likely to be remembered, and Netflix's three-note "ta-dum" has become as load-bearing as its red logo.

The second axis is motion. When a brand's most-touched surface is a screen - a car's central display, an app, a configurator - the way that interface moves becomes part of its character. How a menu eases open, how a needle sweeps, how a welcome animation resolves: these are not cosmetic. They are the brand's body language, and a competitor can copy your colours far more easily than the specific rhythm and weighting of how your product comes to life. Sound and motion share a property that a logo does not: they happen in time. They have tempo, attack, decay. They are performed, not printed.

Here is the concept-phase lesson, and it is the uncomfortable one. Sound and motion cannot be bolted on at the end, the way a jingle gets commissioned after the ad is cut. They are identity dimensions, and identity is decided early or it leaks. A team that spends two years perfecting a silent car's surfaces and then, in the final months, asks an audio vendor for "a startup sound" has already lost - the sound will feel bolted on because it was. A team that treats the sonic and motion signatures as first-class concept-phase decisions, developed alongside the stance and the interface architecture, gets an identity that is coherent across every sense at once.

The badge told you what to look at. It cannot tell you what a brand sounds like when it wakes up, or how it moves when you touch it. Those are now real, designable, ownable parts of who a brand is - and like every other part of identity, they belong to whoever had the conviction to decide them first, while the surfaces were still soft. Your brand has a sound now, whether you designed it or not. The only question is whether you authored it, or inherited it by accident.

Sources: