DESIGN INTELLIGENCEInvalid Date·Mary · DEPIX Design Intelligence

Designed to Be Fixed: What Reparability Reveals About a Product's Real Values

Two products can sit side by side, look identical, cost the same, and differ in one invisible dimension that will decide how long each survives: whether you are allowed to fix it. Open the back of one and you find screws you can remove, a battery you can swap, parts you can buy. Open the other - if you can open it at all - and you find glue, bonded cells, proprietary screws, and components with serial numbers that make an unauthorised repair quietly "fail." That difference is not discovered the day the thing breaks. It was designed in, years earlier, at the concept phase.

Reparability is a design output, not an accident - and for decades the industry engineered against it. A product that dies on schedule sells its replacement, so assemblies got glued instead of screwed, batteries bonded in, parts serialised so a swapped component throws an error. iFixit has spent years documenting how "innovation" quietly became planned failure: replace an iPhone battery or camera with a non-original part and the phone disables features and warnings light up; most iPhone models still score below five out of ten on France's repair index.

That index is the tell that the tide is turning. In 2021 France became the first country to force a repairability score onto the box - a grade out of ten based on how easily a product comes apart and how available and affordable its spare parts are. The EU followed698869_EN.pdf), and from June 2025 every new smartphone and tablet sold in the EU must carry a 1-to-10 repairability rating in plain sight. Suddenly a decision that used to be invisible - how hard did you make this to fix? - is printed next to the price.

And the market is discovering that repairable can be desirable. The Framework laptop is built around modularity as a first principle; its smallest model scores a perfect 10/10 on iFixit, with QR codes on the internal parts and industry-standard components you can buy anywhere. iFixit praised it for a striking reason: it "respects your time, your budget, and your ability to make repairs." Respect is exactly the right word, because reparability is, in the end, a statement about who the product is for.

Here is why it's a concept-phase story and not a service-manual one. Whether a thing can be opened, diagnosed and mended is decided by how it is put together - screws or adhesive, modular boards or one fused assembly, standard cells or a bonded pack, open parts or serialised ones. Every one of those is a first-move architectural decision, made long before the product exists. You cannot make a glued-shut, serialised device repairable at the end; the choice is baked into the joinery. The most consequential sustainability decision in a product is not which recycled material you specify in the CMF pass - it is whether the thing can be taken apart at all, and that is set in the first assembly diagram.

Which means reparability is really a values decision wearing an engineering disguise. A product designed to be opened treats its owner as a capable adult and its own life as long; a product glued and serialised treats the owner as a renter and its own death as a feature. Neither is an accident of manufacturing - both are chosen, on purpose, at the start. The regulation now forcing a score onto the box isn't inventing a new obligation so much as making an old, hidden decision visible.

So the lesson generalises past phones and laptops to anything built to last - or not. How long a thing is meant to live, and who is allowed to keep it alive, is designed in before the first prototype: in the fasteners, the modularity, the availability of the parts, the software that either welcomes a repair or refuses it. You can't bolt longevity on at the end any more than you can bolt on lightness or a good proportion. The next time you can't open something, don't read it as a manufacturing limit. Read it as a decision - made at the concept phase, about exactly how much the people who built it wanted it to last.

Sources: